The Markives



10 December 02024: ACME-21/AVMX-15–There’s A Lot Of Variety Out There, No Matter What The Media Are Playing

A tip o’ the visor this year to Hip Christmas, where the interest in holiday tunes is year-round and very very comprehensive.  A number of this year’s choices (#2, 3, 7, and 8, to name four) have come to my attention through this site.

One other thing that I’m watching very closely this year is the Capitol Fools, an outfit continuing the legacy of the late and lamented Capitol Steps.  No holiday tunes yet that I can find, but there’s hope for the future, even as their tunes might range to the too topical for long-term interest end of the holiday spectrum.

In the meantime, here’s another selection of songs you probably won’t be hearing unless you spend time looking for them.  Which is, of course, what I do.

1. Santa Stole Thanksgiving, Jimmy Buffett.  This tune provides an excuse to look backward on the calendar as we recognize other late-in-the-year holidays.

There are not many Thanksgiving songs, which I don’t view as a problem, but as one who favors an inclusive view of the winter holiday season, it’s reasonable to kick off the list with this song.  Plus, Jimmy B. is usually a welcome presence on the airwaves, virtual or otherwise.

2. That Swingin’ Manger, Bob Francis.  I like multi-level parodies among my holiday comedy, and this one fits that description.  The song starts out sounding like a simple big-band/swing era remake of “Away In A Manger”.

Wrong on both counts.

The track dates from 01995, and can be traced to Ann Arbor and Schoolkids Records, which put out an album, “Blame It On Christmas”, that collects a number of apparent big-band versions of Christmas standards.  This one diverges from the classic lyrics right around verse 2, in a pleasantly comical direction.

Also on this album are such apparent gems as The Second Noel (not a bad idea for a sequel, actually) and The Lil’ Endless Summer Boy, which will take one out of The Little Drummer Boy Challenge if heard between Black Friday and Christmas Eve, so is not linked here.

3. They Shined Up Rudolph’s Nose, Johnny Horton.  We keep the funny stuff coming.  This one really is a throwback, to 01955. 

4. Christmas Is Coming, Vince Guaraldi.  I tapped the soundtrack to A Charlie Brown Christmas back in 02011 for Christmastime Is Here as part of an attempt to highlight remakes that don’t suck—of which there are fewer than I had hoped.

One can dig a lot further into that album for some good tunes, this one included.  There are some echoes of Linus and Lucy, which tag this as a holiday tune even without sleigh bells.

Since the LDBC (in which I'm still alive this year) came up above, it’s worth pointing out that a land mine lurks on that disk in the form of My Little Drum, which must be avoided from Black Friday until the 24th.

5. A Nonsense Christmas, Sabrina Carpenter.  In the tradition of Warm December (AVMX-12) and Vixen (mentioned, though not included, in AVMX-5), here’s a little harmless* holiday innuendo that finds its origin in one of Sabrina C.’s more popular and easily-morphed tunes.  The world waits to see what would happen if she mixed a little Espresso into her eggnog.

Sabrina has had a pretty good year, although it’s worth noting that she was included in AVMX-7 in 02016, well before the recent surge in her public profile.  It’s not often that The Markives is ahead of the trends by so many years.

6. Holidays, Meghan Trainor.  It’s become a tradition lately for Meghan T. to hold down the #6 spot on AVMX, at least until she runs out of good holiday material or something of hers gets too widely known.  Even with Earth, Wind, and Fire as a backing band, this one seems to have avoided wide exposure—which is simultaneously fortunate and unfortunate.

While this one is solid musically, the makeup artists for the video may not have been thinking too clearly–Meghan has a lot of stuff apparently glued onto her face, which cannot have been comfortable.

7. Presents For Christmas, Solomon Burke.  Another time-traveling song, that dates back to 01966.  We are reminded yet again that there’s a lot to be said in holiday tunes for making the point and wrapping things up**; this song runs only 2:40.

Fun fact: In 15 years of doing this, this is the first song in the AVMX collection that has a title starting with the letter “P”.  It’s not like I’ve been deliberately seeking out or avoiding anything in the alphabet, but more-valuable-in-Scrabble letters such as F, H, J, K, W, Y, and Z have all topped off at least one entry in the 1.5 decades.

Nothing starting with “Q” yet, though.  To the extent that a conscious search exists (not much), it continues.

8. Jingle Your Bells, Hush Kids.  Because the neighbors banging on the window with a big flashlight doesn’t get the attention as a Christmas happening that it ought.  The optics there really amuse me.

This is a partner of sorts to #5, but also a callback to Jingle My Bells by The Boy Most Likely To from AVMX-5.  It goes in something of a different direction, though.

9. Merry Christmas In The NFL, Buckner & Garcia.  B&G may have been, by most reasonable definitions, a one-hit wonder ("Do The Donkey Kong", the follow-up to "Pac-Man Fever", only hit #103 on the Bubbling Under chart), though it  wasn't for lack of trying.  Obscurity aside, this is a fun little tune.

10. O Little Town Of Hackensack, PDQ Bach.  One more tribute to the late Peter Schickele (The Markives, 19 January 02024).  This is one case where a well-tuned choir is welcome at AVMX.

A YouTube commenter has pointed out that there was no New Jersey accent in PDQ's time, making some of the choral stylings unnecessary.

"Unnecessary" does not mean "unwelcome".

A line, that, which could be applied to a lot of PDQ's works.

Io Saturnalia!

M–>

*–Maybe not completely harmless, in the case of Vixen.
**–Pun intended.



8 December 02024 (Happy birthday tomorrow!) Upon Further Review

I recognize how someone might think that the selection committee for various FBS playoff configurations over the years has a Southeastern Conference bias.  Indeed, there's not a lot of doubt in my mind that coaches and administrators from that conference encourage that sort of narrow thinking.

That said, if they truly do have such a bias, they did a very good job of concealing it today.  Not in bypassing Alabama for SMU--to do otherwise would have been indefensible*--but by seeding Ohio State #8 and Tennessee #9, thus granting OSU a home date in what is likely to be a somewhat colder environment than if the seeds were reversed and the game were to be in Knoxville.

I admit to tracking this particular issue more closely than is healthy, but to switch the seeds would have attracted little complaint outside of Columbus--perhaps not a lot even there--and tilted things in favor of an SEC school over a Big Ten squad.

It must have been a matter of no small discussion at some point in the last two weeks' meetings.

M-->


*--Not that that would have stopped them.  That said, if your schedule includes Mercer, you have no right to brag about its strength.



21 November 02024 (T + 29): Garnet Anniversary

Fun fact: The 29th anniversary is, in some circles that I've been able to find, the garnet anniversary.  (There's also something out there about furniture, but that's less interesting.)

I'm slightly impressed that the garnet lobby was able to secure any anniversary at all.  On the list of precious and semi-precious stones, garnet, while worthy of inclusion, is surely far down by any sort of accounting due to value, popularity, or whatever the criteria for claiming an anniversary might be.

Even without tagging gemstones onto it all, these 29 bonus years have, in the large, been good ones.

M-->



20 November 02024: This Surely Cannot Last

What I like about the most recent College Football Playoff standings is the sites of the first-round games:

That is, all places where cold weather is very possible on game day.  This constitutes something of an equalizer for Northern schools, even as it may be short-lived.

I hold out no illusions that this is anything more than a quirk of the early rankings, but it's vaguely encouraging as a sign that warm-weather game sites aren't a priority for the selection committee.  Yet--we'll see what happens in December.

M-->

*--That should really be the "FBS Playoff", as there are multiple other college football championship playoffs starting up shortly, but that's not a fight I will win.



5 November 02024: Dispatch From Schr
ödinger's America 2 (Election Boogaloo)

One of the things I like about the "Schrödinger's America" term, which I take to mean "a country which is at the same time doomed and not doomed", as we wait for the outcome of The Most Important Election Of Our Lives This YearTM, is that both sides of the political spectrum would probably buy into that description of things.

For entirely different reasons, of course, but we'd all wind up at the same place.

An additional thought: If the Democrats manage to do well today, a lot of "think" pieces on how the party failed in running this campaign that have been crafted by the left side of the political chattering class and are now residing on hard drives across the country are going to be of only amusement value.  And you know that those pieces have been written.

M-->



4 November 02024: Dispatch From Schrödinger's America

While we wait to see what sort of country we'll have after tomorrow, Sirius/XM started rolling out its holiday channels on 1 November* as expected (Holly is at 79 this year, but shuts down on 26 December.).  WNIC and WFMK have not yet flipped to ACATT.

In the spirit of biting holly, I've been working with this song parody for a while now, and I think it's as good as it's going to get:

O holly bite!  The berries, they are poison!
Don't eat the leaves, they will tear up your mouth!

I think we've got a pretty good argument against literal holly-biting there.  (Originally, the second sentence was "The berries are quite tasty!", but a] I can't confirm that.  b] The facts on the ground are such that no reasonable person should put the idea of trying that into anyone's mind, and I can occasionally be a reasonable person.)

Would that an argument against the figurative version were so easily rolled out.

M-->


*--Exception: SXM's Holiday Traditions channel runs year-round in the app.  I'm okay with this--after all, Christmas music is a legitimate genre or subgenre that qualifies for its own outlet.  Just not 20+ of them, perhaps.



31 October 02024 (I got a rock.): Career Exploration

Another homeopathic fraction that I think about occasionally is the probability that a Division III football player will ever play in the NFL.  The players that I encounter seem perfectly aware of this.

It is encouraging to see that so many young men want to stay involved with the game after their playing days end, and are clearly working toward that goal by preparing for work as game officials.  At least that's one conclusion that their sideline commentary might lead an observer toward.

If you listen closely, you can even hear some of them planning for a future as instructors of officials.  All to the good; I frequently say that we need bright young people going into teaching, and that applies everywhere along the educational spectrum.

M-->



20 October 02024 (Happy birthday!): On The Law Of Unintended Consequences

Sometimes doing the right thing backfires.

My rooting algorithm (The Markives, 12 October 02004) as applied to the National League Championship Series calls for me to support the Mets over the Dodgers (Rule 1: Root against a team from California.)

My ALCS rooting interest did not require the algorithm: On the question of whether it's better to root for or against the team that vanquished your favorite team in the playoffs, I come down firmly on the side of "root against them".  Why should I cheer for Cleveland to extend their run when it comes in part at the Tigers' expense?

I recognize that there are cogent arguments for the opposing point of view, along the lines of "if we lost, at least we lost to the best", but I don't agree with them.  It's a harmless difference of opinion.

Except that this leaves me supporting a Subway Series: Mets vs. Yankees, which is in many ways the worst of all possible worlds.

As if there aren't already too many people who think that the universe (or at least the sports universe) ends at the outskirts of NYC*, the last thing we need is for that universe to validate their collective myopia.

I don't want to see this happen, just not enough to pull for the Dodgers.  I've seen some opining that MLB HQ wants Yankees-Dodgers in the World Series for obvious ratings reasons, but none of the 4 possible matchups was particularly attractive this year.

M-->

*--In the case of MLB, there's a thread of that universe that extends to metro Boston.



9 October 02024: Fifteenth In A Series

Or so some of the press coverage (including the caption on this footage) claimed.

Here's the best video I've found so far of the demolition* of the Tropicana in Las Vegas early this morning.



I get the need for safety, but it seems like this one lost something without thousands of poeple milling in the streets at a safe distance.

Laurie and I (who were in the crowd when the Stardust did the big pancake in 02007) have made a pact to be present when the Bellagio is taken down, which, given resort lifespans, should be sometime around 02060 or thereabouts.  Not because we have anything against it (there's a good gelato place there), but because that was among the newest and nicest resorts when we first visited, and seeing it go away would be a nice closing of some kind of circle.

M-->

*--Technically not an implosion, which is a very specific way of collapsing a building with explosives.



1 October 02024: Celebrity Deathwatch--3 + 1 Edition

Kris Kristofferson: 10.
Dikembe Mutombo: 9.
Pete Rose: 13.

On the sunnier side of the street, I've gotten two emails today specifically notifying me that Jimmy Carter is still alive at age 100.  That's a nice change of pace.

M-->



27 September 02024: Thoughts On Magic

"The magic number is 1" is one of the best sentences that a sports fan can hear, but only if the MN eventually goes to 0.

If it stays stuck at 1, it is conversely one of the saddest sentences.

M-->



11 September 02024: On The Market

On my 530th recorded attempt at Wordle, I finally hit the elusive "got it in 1" target.

Now I need a new starting word.

The day can only go downhill from here.

M-->



6 September 02024: It Was 20 Years Ago Today...

...that The Markives launched its first entry.

A lot has happened since then, including but not limited to the entire life of half of my nephices and both of my great-nephices.

With apologies to Messrs. Harrison, Lennon, McCartney, and Starkey.

M-->



26 August 02024: #56

It's the first day of school.  Again.

While I was prepared for it, I was by no means ready for it.  There's a difference.

Part of the unreadiness is that it was a really good summer this year.  Part of it is that all signs point to a stressful year ahead.  Given some of what's happened around here in the past few years, it's harder than usual to put a positive spin on things.

Nonetheless, we move forward, time being unidirectional.  It would, however, be nice to live in precedented times for a change.

M-->



31 July 02024: Watching The Skies

In and among all of the recent changes to college athletics, there's a not-yet-there movement that I'm kind of watching for.

How long before student non-athletes at some of the top-funded NCAA schools rebel against the idea of mandatory athletics fees charged to all students
 to support sports programs that are pulling in millions of dollars and dispensing life-changing amounts of it to some athletes?

If ever there was a case for mandatory athletics fees--and I'm not sure that there wasn't--it seems like the playing field (pun intended) has changed with recent developments.  I could see some social consciousness fans getting worked up about this, and I think they might have a reasonable case.

Provided they assert themselves reasonably, which is by no means a guarantee.

M-->



29 July 02024 (Happy anniversary!): The Word O' The Day

is "regurgatilite".

That means "fossilized vomit".  (Caution: This gets a bit ichthyo-gastrointestinal, and might be worth skipping over if that sort of thing bothers you.)

While traveling the last few weeks, we came across the following display at Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument in Colorado:



So.  Many.  Questions.

The probability of all of these things happening, often enough that there are multiple researchers who study this sort of thing, is another one of those homeopathic numbers I point out around here.  Yet when multiplied by the number of fish, even if divided by the low chance of fossilization, we see an example of the "everything happens, given enough time" phenomenon that I certainly hadn't been anticipating before this trip.


What's additionally amazing is that some people recognized this for what it is.  "Fossilized fish vomit" would not have been in my top 100 guesses.


M-->



26 July 02024: Celebrity Deathwatch: The Vacation Edition

While I generally avoided a lot of my email while out West, a fair number of famous people passed away while we were away, and I couldn't not keep track.  Here are the final standings:
  1. Bob Newhart: 14.  (Yep, there was another one of those "sad day[s] for comedy" that I keep mentioning around here.)
  2. Dr. Ruth Westheimer: 12.
  3. Richard Simmons: 10.
  4. Lou Dobbs: 5.
  5. Shannen Doherty: 1.

M-->



25 July 02024 (Happy birthday yesterday!): The Purpose of Aphorisms

...is to keep those who have memorized them from having nothing to say.

Isaac Asimov had a point there, but there's a time or two when aphorisms justify their existence, and the last couple of weeks (when I've been out West, avoiding much of the worst of American culture and politics) have been one such time.  Herewith, a wrap-up.

"Democrats fall in love.  Republicans fall in line."

Boy howdy.  The past two months have been a textbook-level illustration of this.  The challenge to the Democrats is to get over this sense of fickleness that they seem to have developed.

"Be careful what you wish for; you might get it."

It took a barely-noticeable amount of time after the fact for the chattering class to lose their minds about President Biden stepping out of the 2024 race, didn't it?  Oddly, some of the best commentary I have heard about how this whole process has played out or not played out comes from physicist Chad Orzel.  You should read his entire piece, but here's an excerpt that I found myself nodding at a lot.

There’s also a level of naked self-interest on the part of the political media that’s been exposed by this whole business.
As I said on ex-Twitter the other day, it’s really remarkable how closely the high-minded strategic advice being offered from the commentariat
as to what course of action would be best for Biden and the Democrats and the nation as a whole
has tracked what’s most fun and lucrative for people who make their living generating #content for political media.

Exactly this.

"Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."

This one has considerable applicability in my professional life, but there is no joy in watching it play out in the political sphere these days.

M-->




28 June 02024: A Quest Not To React, Let Alone Overreact

I vowed only to read sports and entertainment news today, but even those sources are chattering on about the debate last night.  The best take, as is so often the case, comes from Mark Evanier.

M-->



20 June 02024 (Happy birthday, and Happy solstice!): Celebrity Deathwatch: North American Division

Willie Mays (USA) 16, Donald Sutherland (Canada) 12.  Some of this, of course, can be attributed to home-country advantage in my breaking-news sources.  Toronto was the first to report about Mr. Sutherland.  Maine (which is in some ways a southern extension of Canada) chimed in second.

No prominent (prominent enough to generate breaking news emails, that is)  Mexican citizen appears to have passed away recently.

M-->



4 June 02024 (Happy birthday yesterday!) Times Change, And Statistics Must Change With Them

Two things motivate today's missive, which has been fermenting in my mind for quite some time now:
  1. The continued prevalence of the fascism of absolute freedom that Dennis Miller identified long ago, where everybody's got an opinion, and everybody's completely unbending on that opinion.
  2. The continued effort of the media to attach significance to polls about, well, anything these days, even in light of the considerable shortcomings of Presidential polling in June.

As I see it, any opinion poll about pretty much anything significant* these days starts out with about 30% of the relevant population instinctively primed to object to it.


So let's leave them out of the computation, replacing "per cent" (per hundred, remember) with "per sept", or "per 70%".  Let's confine our attention to reasonably-achievable targets.


For example, President Biden's approval rating is running at 38.3% as I type this.  Excluding the 30% who won't approve of him even if he were proved to be the second coming of Christ, this translates to a 54.7 per sept approval rating, which is probably a better indicator of what's going on out there.


This works in reverse.  34-time felon Donald Trump's 41.6% approval rating translates to 59.4 per sept, suggesting that Biden has a little more--though not much--room to raise his standing where it's realistic that he do so.


"Per sept" could be abbreviated "0/7" for the moment; I'm sure the font designers can come up with something nicer-looking.

M-->

*--While I doubt that "cookies" [the pastry, not the snippets of computer code] could get a 100% approval rating, or even 95%, I suspect they'd poll over 70.



24 May 02024: From The Emile Arturi Award Committee

One of the reasons that there is no Emile Arturi Award winner this year is found in what is surely a contender for the most useless rule ever promulgated anywhere, to wit:

When you spend 18 years setting up the conclusion of a TV series, it may safely be said that your ending was not ``artificial".

I refer, of course, to the end of Young Sheldon, which can be tied back (as Chuck Lorre did in the series' antepenultimate vanity card) to the beginning of The Big Bang Theory.

With the "artificial closure" tag removed as a threat, it was highly unlikely that YS would qualify for this dubious recognition.  It doesn't hurt that the eventual last episode wasn't really a universal closure, either.  (That said, bringing back Tam Nguyen and Sheryl Hutchins seemed kind of forced--but not enough to tip the scales.*)

No clunkiness here.  The committee has spoken.

In a semi-related note, there was also admirable restraint displayed in not setting up Georgie and Mandy's First Marriage.  Backdoor pilots are an occasional thing among series that are on their way out the door; good on the team at YS for resisting.  There will be time for that this fall.

M-->

*--I find it odd that the corners of the I'net that are, in my opinion, a little too invested the the absence of any mention of Paige Swanson from TBBT (because, of course, that character didn't exist during most of TBBT's run) haven't reacted to this in any meaningful way.



24 April 02024: On The Curious Nature Of Human Memory

I am frequently amused by what sticks in students' minds from what I tell them.  Sometimes it's "Why in the world did you remember that?".  Sometimes it's more along the lines of "Of all the important things I've talked about, that's what stuck?"

Occasionally, I am pleasantly surprised.  Last week was one of those times.

As some of you know, I work with a lot of students who want to be teachers someday.  As perhaps fewer of you know, I have a list of former students whom I would not want any child that I care about to have as a teacher.  It's not a long list, but it's not an empty list, either.  (This had a lot more meaning when the Gang of 12 was collectively younger, but a] I'll still have 4 nephices in the K-12 system next fall, and b] Since my second great-nephice will be born presently*, this will soon start over again for the next next generation.)

I have a rule that everyone stays off The List when they're actually taking a class from me, and every once in a while, the existence of The List gets mentioned in one of those classes.  One of my recent students, who was never on The List, recently finished student-teaching and will be graduating in 10 days.  She asked me point-blank last week, "So, am I allowed to teach your family?"

Well-played, although this may be the first time I've ever been called on that after the fact.  I assured her that she was not on The List.

I hope she also remembers some of the math and science covered in my classrooms.

M-->

*--That said, I anticipate that it will be a while before that generation gets a book dedication.



22 March 02024: The Meaning Of 80-76 (Other Than 4, That Is)

That would, of course, be the score of yesterday's Oakland-Kentucky NCAA men's March Madness first-round game.

Leaving aside the fact that a lot of coverage has focused on the losing side rather than the winning side, which might self-correct later today as Round Two comes into prominence, once thing worth noting here is that this is strong evidence that the current chatter* about eliminating automatic bids for conference champions is misguided.

Oakland beating Kentucky is getting attention that Florida-Colorado won't get later today, disirregardless** of who wins--to say nothing of a hypothetical Oklahoma-St. John's matchup between two teams that missed the field and snubbed the NIT.  And ultimately, that's a good thing for the NCAA (motto: "We Don't Have All The Money Yet").

Which would be lost if auto-bids went away as some are advocatingZisterous partisanship continues to dazzle.

I will say this: Conference tournaments, however much they might be pitched as a way for any team*** to play their way into the tournament, are farcical.  Maybe there's room for some fixing there, but given that regular-season champions of one-bid leagues who lose in their conference tournaments have lost their automatic bids to the NIT, I am not filled with confidence.

M-->

*--Calling it "discussion" suggests two-way communication that isn't happening.
**--I know that's not a word.
***--Except Chicago State, currently the lone D-I men's basketball independent.  That distinction aside, I'm not 100% sure how that university manages to stay open, except perhaps for the fact that public colleges aren't closing in quite the way that private schools are.



28 February 02024 (Happy birthday!): Speaking Of Not Getting Stuff, Or, $0.02 on Yesterday

I have a very difficult time believing that most of the "Uncommitted" voters from yesterday's Michigan Democratic Presidential primary honestly believe that their interests will be better served if Donald Trump is returned to the Presidency this November.

That may be giving them too much credit, since the ability of people to vote against their own interests is astounding sometimes.  (That said, we've probably all done that from time to time.)

While I respect their point of view, I think that their means are rather on the shortsighted side.

I read something today about some of these resistors* demanding "peace in the Middle East" as a condition for voting for Joe Biden this fall.

Like that's even a remote possibility.

Jon Stewart had it right about that region: "Too many people have too many claims on not enough land.  Jesus, Mohamed, and Moses all went to the same high school."

M-->

*--While my software does not flag "resister" as an error, and "resistor" is more commonly used as a name for a piece of electronics hardware, I think that sentence reads better with the "o" form of the word.



2 February 02024*: On The Current Political Climate

You know the one.

A lot of commentary, reasoned and otherwise, from the citizenry regarding the potential of a rematch of 02020 this November in the Presidential election seems to include ranting about being dissatisfied with both choices.

I'm not sure I've heard that so often expressed in past leap years.  Certainly not with the passion--bordering on anger at not getting something they seem to feel entitled to--coming from some quarters.

Leaving aside the threat to democracy posed by one side, I cannot help but think of Bill Maher's pronouncement from some time in the last century that he's never entered a Presidential election thinking "I don't know which one to vote for; I like them both so much."

That probably describes every election for most voters since...I don't know.  Maybe Eisenhower vs. Stevenson?  Certainly nothing since then.  (Ford vs. Carter may have been a case of two relatively inoffensive [by the standards of the Bicentennial year] major-party candidates, but I don't think "like them both so much" really applied.)  When liking 2 isn't happening, expecting to like 1 seems like a lot to ask of the universe (which, of course, cares not the slightest about all of this).

My instinct when I read about someone issuing this complaint is something along the lines of "Run for office yourself, then."

Not "Run for President"--we have some evidence suggesting that inexperienced folks really shouldn't start at, or even near, the top--but put some actual personal stake into the process.  It's easy to lament your choices when you're not willing to get in there and do something,

M-->


*--I've been writing this in my head for the better part of a month now.  It's time to write it up and move on.  My absentee ballot for the primary election arrived this week, which may have been the final nudge I needed.



19 January 02024 (Or 9): Another Sad Day For Comedy

We have lost another icon (maybe two).  Peter Schickele, a talented musician in his own right but destined to be remembered more for his work on the works of P.D.Q. Bach, has died at 88.  (P.D.Q. himself only made it to -65 or so, living as he did from 01807 to 01742.)

Schickele won a Grammy under his own name for best Classical Crossover Album, and won 4 Best Comedy Recording* Grammy Awards for P.D.Q.'s works.  These were entirely deserved in a way that that particular award hasn't always been.

Here's one of those Grammy winners: WTWP Classical Talkity-Talk Radio.  I am especially a fan of this one because it's set at a radio station.



One track that's fun on multiple levels is #15, the "Safe" Sextet.  The idea of a classical piece written for piccolo, English horn, bass clarinet, contrabassoon, harp, and celesta** is inspired lunacy.  If you don't want to wait for it to come around, you can jump to it here.

RIP, Professor.

M-->

*--For my money, the most important Grammy Award.
**--These were chosen because they are 6 of the "forgotten" instruments of the orchestra.  I find it interesting that 4 of the 6 are woodwinds.  Surely there are some forgotten brass instruments out there.



10 January 02024: For The Record, I Did Enjoy That Last Year Of My 50s

Take that, anonymous well-wisher from 02022.

The fact of the matter is that my 50s were, all in all, a pretty good decade, which is one reason to be less than excited about birthday #LX.  All in all, I'd prefer not to leave that behind.

Of course, that's not an option, and so we move forward in time at the constant rate of 1 day per day.

I'll be back with more age-appropriate ranting in a day or two.

M-->


Previous editions of The Markives:


02023
02022
02021
02020
02019
02018 02017 02016
02015 02014 02013 02012
02011 02010 02009 02008
02007 02006 02005 02004

                  



Click the photo to return to the Bollman family main page.Gang o' 23

 

 

 

The opinions expressed in this page/section are strictly those of the page's author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by Albion College.