2. How would you think the world would be like if
Rutherford didn't conduct his experiment?
3. On page 85, the author says that believing in the
invisible world of the atom requires "faith" in scientific
reason. However, most scientists of "faith" are laughed
out of the community. Where do we draw this line between
"faith in science" and "silly faith?" How do we get our
"faith" in science?
4. Why do you think the scientific community largely
ignored Rutherford?
5. How does Rutherford's writing style compare to
Mendeleev's?
6. What are the advantages and disadvantages of a
scientist who "follows their nose," as opposed to one who
"follows their mind"?